beambrazerzkidai.blogg.se

1. OVERSIGHT BOARD FACEBOOK THEVERGE HOW TO
2. OVERSIGHT BOARD FACEBOOK THEVERGE UPDATE

“It exposes the need for further clear action from the federal government,” said Jim Steyer, CEO of the non-profit Common Sense Media, which rates how appropriate books, movies, websites, and other forms of media are for children.

OVERSIGHT BOARD FACEBOOK THEVERGE HOW TO

A small group of companies are now making increasingly difficult decisions about how to balance speech rights against the harms of disinformation, harassment, and incitements to violence.

The difference, of course, is that these social media platforms have become vital venues for public discourse. As a result, American social media firms (like other private businesses) have wide latitude to set their own rules about what their users can post on their platforms. In many ways, Facebook finds itself in an untenable position because of the extent to which decisions about the acceptability of online speech in the US are in the hands of private companies. “We’ll allow people to share this content to condemn it, just like we do with other problematic content, because this is an important part of how we discuss what’s acceptable in our society,” Zuckerberg wrote in a Facebook post in the run-up to the 2020 US presidential election. The company argues that the public has a right to know what its political leaders are saying, even in some cases where those statements might be harmful. Prominent politicians and heads of state typically get more leeway to post content that violates Facebook’s rules on misinformation, harassment, and hate speech if the company deems those statements newsworthy.

OVERSIGHT BOARD FACEBOOK THEVERGE UPDATE

The board may also issue non-binding recommendations about whether Facebook should update its policies, when asked, as it was in the case of Trump’s ejection from the platform.Īll of this was meant to defuse the torrent of criticism Facebook has faced for its moderation policies-especially when it comes to world leaders. “The Board declines Facebook’s request and insists that Facebook apply and justify a defined penalty.” Facebook’s history of moderation headachesįirst proposed by CEO Mark Zuckerberg in 2018, the quasi-independent Oversight Board was tasked with reviewing Facebook’s most high-stakes moderation decisions and issuing final, binding rulings about whether those decisions should be upheld or overturned. “In applying a vague, standardless penalty and then referring this case to the Board to resolve, Facebook seeks to avoid its responsibilities,” the 19-member body wrote in a press release accompanying its ruling. 6 insurrection at the US capitol, but handed responsibility for deciding Trump’s fate back to Zuckerberg and his executive team. It upheld the company’s initial choice to block Trump from posting in the wake of the Jan. The board refused to accept its role as the company’s lightning rod by kicking the decision back to Facebook.